Supreme Court upholds travel ban

By Meg Wagner, Brian Ries and Veronica Rocha, CNN

Updated 2:12 a.m. ET, June 27, 2018
18 Posts
Sort byDropdown arrow
11:22 a.m. ET, June 26, 2018

First Muslim elected to Congress reacts to ruling upholding Trump's travel ban

Democrat Rep. Keith Ellison, the first Muslim elected to Congress, just spoke to CNN and reacted to the Supreme Court's ruling upholding Trump's travel ban.

The Supreme Court has said, “as long [Trump] puts a very thin veneer of national security on top of all that discrimination and racism, they will buy it. In other words, as long as a pig has some lipstick on it, it’s fine," Ellison said.

He added, "A gloating braggart is not going to win at the end of the day. I have deep faith, the best impulses of this country are about liberty, are about equality, are about religious liberty and freedom...we will prevail."

Watch:

11:17 a.m. ET, June 26, 2018

Jeff Sessions responds to travel ban news with a big smile, Justice official tells CNN

Laura Jarrett reports

Jeff Sessions in the US Capitol in May
Jeff Sessions in the US Capitol in May Photo by Kevin Dietsch-Pool/Getty Images

Attorney General Jeff Sessions is in Los Angeles this morning and found out about the Supreme Court decision from a senior staff member.

A Justice official tells CNN he had a big smile on his face.

11:17 a.m. ET, June 26, 2018

Cory Booker on travel ban ruling: "We need to reclaim our values"

Reacting to the Supreme Court's decision to uphold President Trump's travel ban, Sen. Cory Booker said the US needs to "reclaim" its values.

Booker recently got back to Washington after a trip to the US border, which is grappling with fallout from a Trump administration policy that forced some immigrant families to be separated.

"This stems from a person that started their campaign talking about Mexicans and Muslims and, in a way that just disappoints me," Booker said, referring to President Trump. "I'm just coming back from the border. I'm still emotionally raw with what I saw down there and, you know, we need to reclaim our values."

11:11 a.m. ET, June 26, 2018

These are the countries affected by the Trump travel ban

This is the third version of the travel ban. It was issued in September -- after previous bans had ricocheted through the courts -- and restricts entry from the following seven countries to varying degrees:

  • Iran
  • North Korea
  • Syria
  • Libya
  • Yemen
  • Somalia
  • Venezuela

(Chad was originally on the list but it was recently removed after having met baseline security requirements.)

11:02 a.m. ET, June 26, 2018

Lawyer who represented other side in travel ban case warns Trump against "attacking our Constitution"

TASOS KATOPODIS/AFP/Getty Images
TASOS KATOPODIS/AFP/Getty Images

Supreme Court lawyer Neal Katyal, who represented the state of Hawaii and other challengers in the Supreme Court case involving Trump's travel ban, said he's disappointed with the decision.

He also warned Trump not to take the ruling as "approval to continue attacking our Constitution."

Katyal argued the case before the Supreme Court in April.

During the arguments, he said Trump was claiming limitless authority to exclude anyone he wished and tried to emphasize that Trump's unilateral move to restrict nationals from Muslim-majority countries had usurped congressional power over immigration, in a breach of the terms of the federal Immigration and Nationality Act.

10:59 a.m. ET, June 26, 2018

Republican senator: "This is not a Muslim ban"

Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn, a Texas Republican, just told CNN the Supreme Court's ruling is a big win for Trump, and disputed critics who said that the ban is not targeting Muslims, arguing it’s been mischaracterized by critics as a Muslim ban.

"This is part of the Never Trump resistance to mischaracterize this as being a Muslim ban, this is not a Muslim ban," he said.

Watch:

10:56 a.m. ET, June 26, 2018

Travel industry: White House must make it clear that "legitimate business and leisure travelers" are welcome here

U.S. Travel Association Executive Vice President for Public Affairs Jonathan Grella just sent CNN the following statement, calling on the White House to make clear that "legitimate business and leisure travelers" are welcome in the US despite the ban.

He also said that the "economic stakes" are too high for "the welcome message" to be overlooked.

Here's his full statement:

“Now that the U.S. court system has set guidelines for the president’s executive orders on immigration, we are hopeful that a coherent and durable set of policies can be put into place by the administration."Today's decision should enable the White House to move on to a new messaging phase: making it clear that keeping bad actors out remains a priority, but making it equally clear that legitimate business and leisure travelers are as welcome and desired as ever in the United States."The economic stakes around strong and healthy international travel are too high—and speak too squarely to the president’s priorities of growing exports, jobs, and the GDP—for the welcome message not to become a featured part of the administration’s calculus.”
10:51 a.m. ET, June 26, 2018

Amnesty International: Travel ban "has no place in a country that claims to value human rights"

Human rights organization Amnesty International just sent us its reaction to the Supreme Court's ruling on Trump's travel ban.

Ryan Mace, Grassroots Advocacy & Refugee Specialist at Amnesty International USA, called it a "hateful policy" that "has no place in a country that claims to value human rights."

Here's the full statement:

“This hateful policy is a catastrophe all around – not only for those who simply want to travel, work, or study here in the States, but for those seeking safety from violence as well. While this decision doesn’t address the separate and equally harmful ban on refugees, it cruelly traps people in conflict-afflicted countries and prevents them from seeking safety in the U.S. or being reunited with family. Some of the people banned from this policy are fleeing conflicts that the United States has had a direct hand in creating or perpetuating, as is the case in Yemen and Syria. In those cases especially we are essentially lighting a house on fire and locking the escape door shut. This ban, and the anti-Muslim sentiment in which it originated, has no place in a country that claims to value human rights.” 
10:51 a.m. ET, June 26, 2018

ACLU: History "will judge today's decision harshly"

The American Civil Liberties Union called the Supreme Court's decision to uphold President Trump's travel ban "wrong," adding that the move allows "official racism and xenophobia to continue."

The group added that history "will judge today's decision harshly."

Here's the tweet: